We’re all looking for an end to the winter doldrums, but whatever meteorological fortunes Punxsutawney Phil might indicate in a few days, the real start of spring doesn’t come until pitchers and catchers report. The vernal equinox ain’t the boss of me! But before camp opens, some unfinished offseason business remains, with scads of free agents still unsigned. And while many of the biggest names — Shohei Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Aaron Nola — have long been off the board, there are still players out there who could have a real effect on their next team’s fate.
Of course, we could just wait and see what happens, but I’m impatient. Since I just finished the ZiPS team-by-team rundowns, let’s use them… for evil. Rather than sit around checking our watches, I asked ZiPS to estimate which team will get the biggest championship boost from each free agent. Now, these suggestions don’t have the force of law or extortion — I’d need to be about 700% smarter and at least 7% more villainous to properly construct a doomsday machine — but let’s just imagine. Just to be clear, these aren’t predictions about what will happen, but rather an indication of which team the projections say has the greatest 2024 incentive to sign each player. And if teams aren’t considering these signings, well, maybe they should? We’ll use our 2024 free agent rankings and forcibly sign some of the players remaining. For each player, I’ll include their percentile projections with their new, possibly unwilling employers.
Given the riskiness of his profile, especially in the power department, I’m definitely uneasy with some of the contract numbers that have been thrown around for Bellinger. But he’s the best center fielder practically available and he’s not just an acceptable fill-in at the position; he’s a legitimately excellent defensive player whose glove helped mitigate the damage in his brutal offensive seasons. The hole left by trading Juan Soto is San Diego’s biggest unaddressed problem for 2024, but Trent Grisham being included in the swap also created some roster headaches. Grisham isn’t a star, he fought with the Mendoza line last year, and he’s prone to bunting at inopportune times, but he’s projected as a 2-3 WAR player at a position where the Padres don’t have obvious answers. Whatever combination of José Azocar, Jakob Marsee, Óscar Mercado, and others ends up manning the position, the Friars are likely to be towards the bottom of the league here. Bellinger would do a lot to remedy that.
A return to the Cubs may feel more natural, but Pete Crow-Armstrong projects as being more than capable, and with some serious upside to boot, two things that can’t be said of most of San Diego’s options.
ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Cody Bellinger (544 PA)
Percentile |
2B |
HR |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS+ |
WAR |
95% |
33 |
30 |
.309 |
.374 |
.543 |
146 |
5.0 |
90% |
31 |
28 |
.296 |
.361 |
.517 |
136 |
4.3 |
80% |
28 |
25 |
.285 |
.348 |
.495 |
127 |
3.7 |
70% |
27 |
23 |
.275 |
.339 |
.475 |
121 |
3.2 |
60% |
25 |
22 |
.268 |
.331 |
.460 |
114 |
2.8 |
50% |
24 |
20 |
.261 |
.322 |
.437 |
108 |
2.4 |
40% |
23 |
18 |
.251 |
.315 |
.422 |
102 |
2.0 |
30% |
22 |
17 |
.245 |
.309 |
.411 |
96 |
1.6 |
20% |
20 |
15 |
.235 |
.300 |
.394 |
89 |
1.2 |
10% |
18 |
13 |
.224 |
.286 |
.370 |
80 |
0.5 |
5% |
16 |
12 |
.216 |
.279 |
.352 |
73 |
0.0 |
Bellinger signing with the Padres is extremely unlikely without a shove, and the odds that Snell goes to the Orioles are even more remote. Acting Orioles team owner John Angelos appears to want to pay next to nothing to players, and Snell is going to cost a good chunk of change no matter how you feel about the specifics of the ERA vs. FIP fights that accompanied the Cy Young discourse last fall. But the Orioles’ need for another starter has been obvious for more than a year, with little movement by the team. As you might expect, righties tend to have greater success hitting fly balls off Snell, so if you want him to sustain his low home run rate from the last two seasons, why not put him in Camden Yards, a park that recently made it more difficult for righties to hit homers? Stick Snell at the top of the O’s rotation and suddenly Kyle Bradish–Dean Kremer–Grayson Rodriguez looks like a pretty enticing no. 2/3/4. What’s more, an injury doesn’t make the team overly reliant on Cole Irvin or Cade Povich.
ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Blake Snell (159 IP)
Percentile |
ERA+ |
ERA |
WAR |
95% |
169.3 |
2.42 |
5.7 |
90% |
149.1 |
2.75 |
4.9 |
80% |
136.3 |
3.01 |
4.3 |
70% |
127.4 |
3.22 |
3.8 |
60% |
119.7 |
3.42 |
3.5 |
50% |
113.1 |
3.62 |
3.0 |
40% |
108.2 |
3.79 |
2.7 |
30% |
100.4 |
4.08 |
2.2 |
20% |
90.5 |
4.53 |
1.4 |
10% |
81.3 |
5.04 |
0.7 |
5% |
74.4 |
5.51 |
0.1 |
Since we already gave Snell to the O’s, they would no longer get the biggest boost from adding Montgomery. While ZiPS sees starting pitching as a need for the Rangers, once you factor in possible summer innings from Jacob deGrom, Max Scherzer, and Tyler Mahle, the need becomes less pressing. But the Mets still need rotation help — they didn’t sign Scherzer and Justin Verlander before the 2023 season because they wanted to film a remake of Grumpy Old Men — and Luis Severino comes with some big question marks. Severino, Sean Manaea, and Adrian Houser serve to keep the floor from getting too bleak, but the team needs more upside if they’re going to have a nice bounce-back season. And unlike the first two proposed signings, there’s actually a reasonable chance the Mets might do this willingly.
ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Jordan Montgomery (170 IP)
Percentile |
ERA+ |
ERA |
WAR |
95% |
156.3 |
2.66 |
5.4 |
90% |
143.8 |
2.89 |
4.9 |
80% |
130.3 |
3.19 |
4.3 |
70% |
122.4 |
3.39 |
3.8 |
60% |
116.8 |
3.56 |
3.5 |
50% |
112.1 |
3.71 |
3.1 |
40% |
107.0 |
3.88 |
2.8 |
30% |
101.5 |
4.09 |
2.4 |
20% |
93.9 |
4.42 |
1.8 |
10% |
88.4 |
4.70 |
1.3 |
5% |
83.9 |
4.95 |
0.9 |
At least from my perusal of social media, Toronto fans seem to have rather mixed feelings about Chapman. I think after three months of full-time starts from Cavan Biggio and Isiah Kiner-Falefa, however, regrets may start to accumulate. The Blue Jays need better third base options than they currently have, and they project to be right in the middle of the AL East division race, meaning that each additional fractional win squeezed out of the roster may be the one that gets them into the postseason. Chapman’s glove came back strong in 2023, so a gentle decline may be in order. And ZiPS doesn’t even know that my colleague Michael Baumann just wrote about Chapman’s defense at third and its value to the Jays.
ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Matt Chapman (579 PA)
Percentile |
2B |
HR |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS+ |
WAR |
95% |
40 |
39 |
.293 |
.376 |
.568 |
156 |
6.1 |
90% |
37 |
35 |
.277 |
.367 |
.543 |
149 |
5.7 |
80% |
34 |
31 |
.265 |
.356 |
.506 |
136 |
4.8 |
70% |
32 |
29 |
.256 |
.345 |
.486 |
129 |
4.3 |
60% |
30 |
27 |
.248 |
.339 |
.468 |
123 |
3.9 |
50% |
28 |
25 |
.240 |
.333 |
.453 |
117 |
3.6 |
40% |
27 |
24 |
.234 |
.326 |
.434 |
111 |
3.1 |
30% |
25 |
22 |
.225 |
.319 |
.417 |
104 |
2.6 |
20% |
23 |
20 |
.216 |
.309 |
.399 |
97 |
2.2 |
10% |
20 |
17 |
.202 |
.291 |
.370 |
86 |
1.4 |
5% |
18 |
15 |
.190 |
.281 |
.344 |
77 |
0.9 |
Giving Montgomery to the Mets improved the team’s projections enough that Soler’s wins are even more high-impact than they previously would have been. Sure, DJ Stewart was surprisingly adequate during his stint with the Mets, but given that his 116 wRC+ in the minors in 2023 only translates to a high-90s wRC+ in the majors, none of the projections are that enthused by him. Stewart can still find a use on the roster — in this case, as a spare outfielder and a fallback option for Starling Marte in right field — but Soler is the safer bet as an offensive player. And at DH, you don’t have to watch him play defense! With Joc Pederson signed in Arizona, ZiPS still projects Soler as fitting best with the Mets, even if you go by Steamer’s more optimistic Stewart projection.
ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Jorge Soler (530 PA)
Percentile |
2B |
HR |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS+ |
WAR |
95% |
29 |
39 |
.271 |
.374 |
.565 |
158 |
4.3 |
90% |
26 |
37 |
.262 |
.364 |
.537 |
147 |
3.7 |
80% |
24 |
33 |
.248 |
.351 |
.504 |
135 |
2.9 |
70% |
23 |
31 |
.241 |
.341 |
.485 |
129 |
2.5 |
60% |
21 |
29 |
.233 |
.332 |
.467 |
121 |
2.0 |
50% |
20 |
27 |
.226 |
.326 |
.448 |
114 |
1.6 |
40% |
19 |
25 |
.218 |
.318 |
.428 |
109 |
1.3 |
30% |
18 |
23 |
.210 |
.308 |
.415 |
105 |
1.1 |
20% |
16 |
21 |
.201 |
.298 |
.394 |
97 |
0.5 |
10% |
14 |
19 |
.186 |
.281 |
.359 |
82 |
-0.5 |
5% |
13 |
16 |
.176 |
.272 |
.340 |
74 |
-1.0 |
The Marlins snuck into the playoffs in 2023, but it had very little to do with the state of their offense, which was last in the NL in runs scored. Losing Soler — first to free agency, and then to the Mets in our scenario — makes an awful situation even worse. The plan for the DH spot in Miami appears to be giving Josh Bell days off and pretending Avisaíl García should be starting in the majors in 2024. Bringing in Martinez for a year could at least give the Fish some additional (very) short-term upside. Yes, the Marlins are spending money; remember, they have to do what the computer says! It’s not a great projection, but the outlook for the DH spot is absolutely brutal otherwise.
ZiPS Projection Percentiles – J.D. Martinez (494 PA)
Percentile |
2B |
HR |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS+ |
WAR |
95% |
42 |
29 |
.308 |
.372 |
.567 |
152 |
3.6 |
90% |
38 |
26 |
.292 |
.359 |
.531 |
141 |
3.0 |
80% |
35 |
23 |
.279 |
.344 |
.507 |
130 |
2.4 |
70% |
32 |
22 |
.269 |
.334 |
.488 |
123 |
1.9 |
60% |
30 |
20 |
.261 |
.327 |
.469 |
117 |
1.5 |
50% |
28 |
19 |
.252 |
.318 |
.453 |
109 |
1.1 |
40% |
26 |
17 |
.245 |
.309 |
.431 |
104 |
0.8 |
30% |
24 |
16 |
.238 |
.301 |
.417 |
97 |
0.4 |
20% |
22 |
14 |
.224 |
.294 |
.396 |
89 |
-0.1 |
10% |
19 |
12 |
.211 |
.279 |
.370 |
78 |
-0.7 |
5% |
17 |
10 |
.196 |
.268 |
.338 |
71 |
-1.2 |
Source
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/zips-ifying-the-free-agent-market/